Pros and Cons of Going to Trial Versus Taking a Plea Deal

Plea Deal

Deciding whether to go to trial or take a plea deal can be daunting, especially for someone facing criminal charges. There are important factors to consider, such as the specific crime, how the evidence looks, and other facts related to the case.

Pros of Going to Trial

The primary benefit of going to trial is that it gives an individual accused of a criminal charge more control over their fate. The jury will ultimately decide the defendant’s guilt or innocence, allowing them to put forth evidence that proves their innocence. 

Furthermore, if convicted, based on their testimony before the court, they may be offered lesser sentences than if they had taken a plea deal. 

Additionally, some criminals who feel morally responsible for what they have done might prefer going before a jury rather than taking a plea bargain to make amends for their actions by showing remorse and accountability.

Cons of Going To Trial

The main disadvantage of going to trial is that it can be lengthy with no guarantee of success. Depending on how complicated the facts are in each case and whether the expert must call witnesses, proceedings could last several days or weeks.

And if found guilty by the jury, defendants could face harsher penalties than those proposed under a plea agreement. Moreover, legal costs can quickly add up when fighting a criminal charge in court, so individuals also need to weigh financial benefits and potential punishments when considering this option.

Pros of Taking A Plea Deal

Pleading guilty through accepting a plea agreement carries its rewards, including avoiding potentially lengthy jail time associated with being found guilty following those same charges at trial.

Additionally, decreased fines may also come into play depending on what sentence is proposed under the plea agreement, which could save an individual a considerable amount of money in the long run as well as ensure predictable outcomes since pleas deals typically don’t leave room for surprises from judges at sentencing hearings compared to trials where often longer sentences are imposed by jurors due emotions affecting decisions during deliberations.

Cons Of Taking A Plea Deal

Unfortunately for defendants who choose this route, there are risks associated with pleading guilty even when accepting offers presented by prosecutors, such as having admitting guilt on one’s criminal record forever and not being allowed to remove those convictions later. 


Going to trial and taking a plea deal have pros and cons. Taking a plea deal often means a less serious outcome for the defendant, with smaller sentences or fines associated with the offense. It also opens up an individual to potential future consequences and a conviction on their record. 

Going to trial may have more lenient sentencing or even a pardon. Still, it can be expensive in terms of time and money and carries substantial risks of harsher penalties should the defendant be found guilty. 

Ultimately it is important for individuals facing criminal charges to discuss their options with an attorney to make an informed decision about which route is best for them.

For taking complete knowledge about Trial Versus Taking a Plea Deal contact an experienced defense lawyer.

Owen McEvilly

Learn More →